In the Desert with Jesus

In the Desert with Jesus: Biblical Themes of Lent

“When we think of Lent, we think of spring. That’s because Lent comes from a German word for “springtime.” In many other languages (e.g., Spanish: Cuaresma), the name for the season before Easter is derived from the Latin word for “40,” a clue that something else important is happening, something that our Scripture talks about.
The Temptation in the Wilderness 1824 by John St John Long 1798-1834
John St John Long (1798-1831), “The Temptation in the Wilderness” 1824

The 40 days of Lent recall the 40 days of Jesus’ being tempted in the wilderness (Mt 4:1-11; Mk 1:12-13; Lk 4:1-13). But when we look at the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ temptations, always read on the first Sunday of Lent, we see that they in turn direct us further. Jesus’ temptations recall the 40 years of Israel’s temptation in the wilderness on their journey to the Promised Land…
israel wilderness
The number 40 is a very familiar one in the Bible. In the story of Noah and the flood, it rains 40 days and 40 nights (Gn 7:4,12,17; 8:6). After the sealing of the covenant at Mt. Sinai, Moses is with God on the mountain for 40 days and 40 nights (Ex 24:18). When the prophet Elijah is being pursued by Queen Jezebel, he flees for his life and travels 40 days and nights until he comes to the mountain of God at Horeb (Sinai) (1 Kgs 19:8). The number appears also in the New Testament. Jesus is tempted in the desert for 40 days and nights; his ascension to heaven occurs 40 days after the Resurrection (Acts 1:3).

In the passage at the start of this section, the Israelites are encamped in the southern desert, within easy reach of the Promised Land. Scouts go ahead to survey the land, which they do for 40 days (Nm 13:25). They bring a glowing report of the land, but also note that some of the inhabitants are large and imposing. Despite the urgings of Joshua and Caleb, the people are afraid to go up into the land. Their refusal is a serious failure of faith in Yahweh’s promise to give them the land. As a punishment, the people are to wander for 40 years, one year for each day the scouts were gone.

Numbers in the Bible are often not meant to be taken literally, but serve a symbolic function. Our suspicions are aroused especially with a number that recurs so frequently as 40. What would be the symbolic meaning of the number 40? On one level, it represents a longer period of time, but there is more. The longer time has content: It is a time of need, of struggle, of testing. There is in fact extra-biblical evidence for this usage as well. But in the Bible, a third level of meaning appears. Forty denotes a period of preparation for some special action of the Lord; it is a time of grace.

After the flood in Genesis, a new creation begins. After Moses converses with God, the covenant is renewed. After Israel’s wandering in the wilderness, they will enter into the Promised Land. After Elijah’s journey, God strengthens him to resume his prophetic ministry. After Jesus’ temptation, he begins his public ministry; after the Ascension, we enter the age of the Church. At the end of the season of Lent, we celebrate Holy Week and the great feast of Easter.

• Wilderness

Since the “time” of the wandering is more or less symbolic, what about the place? Israel certainly knew the real wilderness, since that would describe fairly well the regions to the south, southwest and east across the Jordan. The desert is a place of no water and no food since little vegetation can grow there. It is also the abode of dangerous animals. The desert is a place of extremes where choices are more clear-cut.
canaan desert
The wilderness also could carry symbolic meaning. In the religion of Canaan, a special god named Mot (a word that can also mean “death”) was in charge of the hot, dry, barren place, the wilderness, and of the hot, dry, barren time, the summer. Rain ceases; vegetation dries up and dies. The wilderness is a negative place where the power of Death/Mot holds sway, where basic questions have to be dealt with. In the Gospels, Jesus is tempted in the wilderness to be a different kind of Messiah; to take the path of spectacle and power rather than that of humble service, but this temptation would continue throughout his ministry up to his death itself when he is taunted to come down off the cross.

Many spiritual writers today speak of a “wilderness experience.” This is a kind of retreat experience, time set apart to focus on, to ask, to consider, to respond to basic questions of the spiritual life. It need not be, and often is not, a literal “desert place,” though that is not impossible. Lent is the Church’s annual “wilderness experience,” its retreat to ask again the basic questions.

• Time of journey

Israel’s time in the wilderness was not simply a time of aimless wandering, of pointless movement. They were on a journey with a beginning in Egypt and an end in the plains of Moab as they are about to enter the promised land of Canaan. It progresses in orderly stages, from Egypt to Sinai, where they stay almost a year, and then from there to Moab.
Two temptations against the journey recur and have to be dealt with. The first is the temptation simply to stop the journey, to settle down, to say, “That’s enough! Let’s stay here.” There were periodic resting places along the way, for example, at the oasis of Kadesh Barnea (Nm 13:26; 20:1), but the time comes to get moving again, and they do this “at the bidding of the Lord” (Nm 9:17-18; 10:11-13).
In the Book of Deuteronomy, Moses recalls the departure from Sinai: God says, “You have stayed long enough at this mountain.…Leave here…” (Dt 1:6-7). The community is forbidden to settle down too long. A similar theme can be noted in the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ transfiguration (the reading for the second Sunday of Lent). “It is good that you are here. If you wish, I will make three tents” (Mt 17:4). But they come down from the mountain. Could this be a temptation we face in our Christian lives? The God of the Bible is a God who calls us continually out of secure and comfortable presents into unknown and risky futures.

In some ways, the second temptation is even worse. “And they complained to Moses…Why did you bring us out of Egypt?” (Ex 14:11). They do not want to stop the journey; they want to reverse it. They want to go back. Even though they have seen all the signs and wonders God has worked on their behalf, they wish these had not happened. They want to go back to Egypt!

The second temptation is idolatrous, seductive (especially for religious people) and very common. It is nostalgia for the past. The past looks more attractive, more secure, safer. As well it ought! We have already been there; it holds no surprises. What makes the past so attractive is precisely the fact that it is past, and preferably not too recent. Nostalgia depends on distance and selective amnesia. We are indeed supposed to remember the past; this is absolutely essential. But when we do this, we bring the past into the present in order to help us live into the future. In nostalgia, on the other hand, we want to bring the present into the past in order to avoid the future.

How often this is justified by an appeal to the Bible! “Back to the Bible,” we hear, “back to the Bible!” Do we ever hear, “Forward to the Bible?” When we go back to the Bible, what we find there is a God who is always out ahead of us, calling us into the unknown, into the future. Could this be a temptation we face on the journey of our Christian lives?
We have looked at several general aspects of Israel’s wilderness experience. We now look more closely at exactly what happened in the wilderness. It is a place of covenant, of testing and of presence.

• Place of covenant

The main thing that happened to Israel in the wilderness was their covenant with Yahweh at Mt. Sinai. But we can ask first, “Why could God not have led Israel directly from the sea-crossing into Canaan?” This was the ultimate goal, but there was an intermediate goal of primary importance. Moses had said repeatedly to Pharaoh, “The Lord, the God of the Hebrews, sent me to you with the message: —Let my people go, to worship me in the desert'” (Ex 7:16). Yahweh’s people come to Sinai to learn to worship Yahweh.
moses pharoah
“Moses and Aaron before Pharaoh: An Allegory of the Dinteville Family”, 1537. Master of the Dinteville Allegory (Netherlandish or French, active mid-16th century)

But perhaps we can go a bit deeper. In a situation of oppression, a twofold problem exists: Some people are oppressed because others are oppressors. History eloquently attests that most often, when a people are freed from oppression, they quickly become oppressors in turn. The victims of today become the oppressors of tomorrow. The problem is that both share a common set of values; they agree on the basic issues, but disagree on the present arrangement of things. The chain of oppression goes on.

If the Israelites, newly freed from oppression in Egypt, were to go directly into Canaan and assume power there, why would they be any different? Instead of Canaan, they come to Sinai for an extended period of “attitude adjustment.” Covenant with Yahweh, the God who frees from oppression, calls them to a whole different view of reality, a new set of values and a totally different style of life. To live the covenant truly is to worship this God and to be concerned for the rights and needs of others. The only way to break the chain is to become a servant of Yahweh.

During his temptations in the wilderness, Jesus is also tempted to live by a set of values totally different from those of the Father. Will he be the kind of Messiah that God was calling him to be, or would he go the more culturally acceptable way of power, prestige an spectacle? We know the answer.

During Lent we examine our lives in the light of our sharing in the covenant of Christ. We too are called to a view of reality and a set of values quite different from those of the culture(s) around us. Do we really embody them in our lives?

• Place of testing

The wilderness was also the place where Israel was tested in its faithfulness to Yahweh and where it repeatedly failed. What is it that tests the Israelites’ faith? They have nothing to drink; God provides them with wonderful water from the rock (Ex 17:2-7). They have no food; God sends them manna (Ex 16). They are threatened by enemies from without, —the Egyptians first, then the Amalekites (Ex 17:8-15); later they will face others (Nm 21:1-3; 21-35; 25:16-18). In addition to this, there are internal struggles for power. Disputes center especially on the leadership of Moses and Aaron (Nm 12:1-16; 14:1-4; 16:1-35).

The wilderness is a place of extremes, and choices are more clear-cut. Food and water are essential for physical survival. Security from external threat and internal stability are essential for social survival. These are legitimate needs, but in the wilderness, they become temptations for Israel’s faith: Will they maintain their faith in the God who brought them safely from Egypt and who guides them in the wilderness? They often failed. They could not unlearn so quickly and easily all the old values of their previous way of life.
Jesus, in the wilderness, was also tempted about food; unlike Israel, he kept his faith in God. What of us? As strongly as we may say that we want—and really intend—to follow God, many forces remain, within and without, to pull us away and push us toward idols. It is always the most legitimate needs (e.g., food, water, defense, internal order) which can become the most seductive idols. Is our service of God the true foundation of our life?

• Place of presence

The wilderness was a place of threats to life and of death. The Israelites are tested to see if, in fact, they will truly believe that their God, a God of life, is with them there.
At the beginning of their exodus, God had called to Moses from the burning bush and sent him to lead the people out of Egypt. Moses replied, “When I go to the Israelites and say to them, —The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ if they ask me, —What is his name?’ what am I to tell them?” God replied, “I am who I am” (Ex 3:13-14). God’s enigmatic answer implies that “I am with you/I am present to/for you” (see Ex 3:12, 16-17).
ark wilderness
In addition to the assurance of God’s presence, reflected in the “name,” there were more tangible signs of God’s presence: the Ark and the Tent. The Tent was a portable shrine that could be carried with them on their journey; the Ark, a portable throne for God, was kept in the Tent. These were visible reminders of the continuing presence of God in the midst of the people. Whether encamped or on the march, they should not be afraid because Yahweh was with them.

Jesus never wavered in his close relationship to God. We Christians are assured that Jesus indeed is “God with us” (Emmanuel, Mt 1:23), and he has assured us, “And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age” (Mt 28:20). In the midst of our struggles, temptations, journeys, do we really believe that God is with us? The wilderness is a place to nurture our belief that God is truly with us.

During the 40 days of Lent, we share with the whole Church an annual “wilderness experience.” The questions and issues we face are basically the same as those we have seen in the Old Testament and in the New. They are themes ripe for our Lenten practice, themes around which we can organize our traditional Lenten practices of prayer, fasting and almsgiving…

“In the Desert with Jesus: Biblical Themes of Lent” By Michael D. Guinan, O.F.M., a professor of Old Testament, Semitic languages and biblical spirituality at the Franciscan School of Theology in Berkeley, California.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: